Depending on your work flow and style of CAD, these drawbacks might have exactly zero effect on your productivity, or a drastic effect on your productivity.Īfter trying the program out for the second time, I wasn't as impressed as the first trial for a few different reasons. I noticed some features that should be included in the 'classic' license aren't one needs to get a 'Pro' or 'Platinum' license just to obtain a few simple features. This even applies for the 'classic' license. Also, to get the best value from the software's pricing scheme, you need to make a relatively large initial investment. For one, block creation is really far behind (You can import blocks from AutoCAD though perhaps another user can chime in as to whether this creates stability issues or not). The long answer: There are a few objective drawbacks to using BricsCAD. I myself would keep an AutoCAD LT license active just in case and to create dynamic blocks ). It's for sure one of the better choices if you want to replace AutoCAD completely, because compared to some of the other AutoCAD clones, the file compatibility between it an AutoCAD is superior* (*This is hearsay but from a reliable source, I haven't had enough time to test that out personally. The short answer is yes, it can replace AutoCAD 100% for some users. It's outright better than Acad in some areas in fact (it runs much smoother on my computer for one). The program has it's strengths and weaknesses when comparing to AutoCAD. It was the second time doing the free trial in the last few years.
0 kommentar(er)
